Virtual Grammar Refresher Course

VIRTUAL COURSE

Years in Business
0 +
Training Courses
0 +
Topic Areas
0
Service Offerings
0 +
WRT
-
722
Two-Hour Virtual Course

Grappling with Grammar Gremlins  

A Two-Hour English Usage Refresher for Native English Speakers

Virtual Grammar Refresher Course

Course Highlights

This grammar refresher course will:

  • Identify quick wins that produce immediate improvement in spoken and written communication.
  • Address filler words and weak phrases that inflate sentences without adding meaning.
  • Cover the irregular verb conjugations that trip up even experienced communicators.
  • Clarify the sound-alike word pairs that cause the most frequent errors in professional writing.
  • Examine nonstandard usage that signals a lack of polish to the people who notice it.
  • Review pronoun rules, including subject and object pronouns and the who versus whom distinction.
  • Address the less obvious errors that spell-checkers miss and readers catch.

Course Overview

Native English speakers carry a specific disadvantage into grammar training: they have been using the language their entire lives, which means the errors have had time to calcify into habits. The mistake does not feel like a mistake. It sounds right because it has always sounded right. That is exactly what makes it hard to fix without someone pointing it out directly.

“Grappling with Grammar Gremlins: A Two-Hour English Usage Refresher for Native English Speakers” is a focused virtual session that addresses the grammar and usage problems that most commonly undermine professional credibility. The course does not cover every rule in the language. It covers the rules people get wrong most often in workplace communication: the filler words that make sentences longer without making them better, the irregular verbs that get conjugated incorrectly out of habit, the sound-alike pairs that writers confuse under deadline pressure, the nonstandard constructions that mark someone as less careful than the work requires, and the pronoun errors that persist because no one ever corrected them.

Two hours. Eight topics. A faster, cleaner, more credible version of the communication your team already produces.

The following outline highlights the course’s main learning points. For virtual delivery, the structure and timing are intentionally set to support discussion and practice. We can adjust emphasis or drop select elements based on your business priorities. Upon request, we can preview the participant materials with you prior to the session(s).

Program Objectives

At this program’s conclusion, participants should be able to:

  • Identify and apply quick wins that immediately strengthen professional communication.
  • Recognize and remove filler words and weak phrases from written and spoken language.
  • Correctly conjugate the irregular verbs that cause the most frequent errors.
  • Distinguish between sound-alike word pairs and choose the correct form in context.
  • Identify and replace nonstandard constructions with standard alternatives.
  • Apply subject and object pronoun rules correctly, including who and whom.
  • Eliminate weak words that add length without adding meaning.
  • Catch the less obvious errors that standard proofreading tools miss.

Program Modules

Quick Wins: Low-Hanging Fruit

Some grammar improvements require years of practice. Others require about thirty seconds of awareness. This opening discussion identifies the corrections that produce immediate results with almost no effort: stopping a sentence before the dangling “at,” swapping “your welcome” for “you’re welcome,” dropping “myself” when “me” works fine, and using “between you and me” instead of “between you and I.” Participants will work through each quick win, examine why the incorrect version sounds natural to so many people, and leave with a short list of fixes they can apply the same day.

Filler Free: Cutting Words That Cost You Nothing to Lose

Some words earn their place in a sentence. Others just take up space. This discussion addresses the filler words and weak phrases that inflate professional communication without adding meaning: “that,” “so,” “really,” “very,” “just,” “basically,” and “in order to,” among others. Participants will examine each one, test whether the sentence survives without it, and practice the habit of reading back through their own writing with these specific targets in mind. The group will also discuss the spoken versions of the same problem, since filler words that appear in writing often appear in meetings and calls first.

Verb Sense: Getting Irregular Conjugations Right

English irregular verbs do not follow the rules, which means the only way to get them right is to know them. This part of the course addresses the conjugations that cause the most frequent errors in professional communication: drink/drank/drunk, run/ran/run, go/went/gone, drive/drove/driven, see/saw/seen, and others. Participants will examine incorrect examples drawn from real workplace communication, identify the error, and practice the correct form. The discussion covers why these mistakes persist even among strong communicators and gives participants a reliable way to check themselves when a verb form feels uncertain.

Sound-Alikes: Choosing the Right Word Every Time

Than and then. Affect and effect. Complement and compliment. Accept and except. Further and farther. These pairs sound similar enough that writers reach for the wrong one under pressure, and spell-checkers will not flag the error because both words are real. This discussion works through the most commonly confused pairs in professional writing, establishing a clear and memorable distinction for each one and giving participants a quick test they can apply whenever the choice is not immediately obvious. The group will also cover e.g. versus i.e., a distinction that trips up even careful writers in formal documents.

Standard Issue: Replacing Nonstandard Usage

Every region and community develops its own language patterns, and some of those patterns do not travel well into professional contexts. This part of the course addresses the nonstandard constructions that signal a lack of polish to readers and listeners who notice them: “irregardless,” “try and,” “needs washed,” “I could care less,” “should of,” “alot,” “graduated school,” and others. Participants will examine each one, understand why it is nonstandard rather than simply wrong, and practice the standard replacement. The discussion is direct without being condescending: these are habitual patterns, not character flaws, and replacing them is straightforward once the pattern is visible.

Pronoun Problems: Getting Them Right

Pronoun errors are among the most common in professional communication and among the most noticed by the people who care about such things. This discussion addresses subject and object pronoun rules, including the constructions that cause the most trouble: “her and I,” “between you and I,” “Meera and me enjoy,” and the who versus whom distinction. Participants will work through a series of evaluation exercises, identifying the error in each sentence and producing the correction. The group will also address pronoun agreement and how to handle sentences that refer to an unnamed individual without reaching for a nonstandard construction.

Weak Words: Cutting What Is Not Pulling Its Weight

Some words do not add meaning. They add the impression of meaning while softening, hedging, or padding a sentence that would be stronger without them. This discussion addresses the specific vocabulary that weakens professional communication: overused intensifiers, vague nouns, and the words that make a writer sound less certain than the situation requires. Participants will practice identifying weak language in sample sentences and replacing it with something more precise, building the editorial instinct that makes revision faster and the final product sharper.

Less Obvious Errors: What Spell-Check Will Not Catch

Automated tools catch spelling errors and some grammar problems. They do not catch the subtler mistakes that mark professional writing as less careful than it should be: using “like” as a verbal tic, treating “literally” as an intensifier rather than a factual claim, confusing “who” and “that” when referring to people, mixing up “less” and “fewer,” and subject-verb agreement errors such as “there’s many options.” This closing discussion addresses each of these patterns, explains the rule behind the correction, and gives participants a final set of targets for their own self-editing process.

Target Audience

This training is designed for groups that want to:

  • Strengthen the grammar and usage habits that shape professional credibility.
  • Correct persistent errors that have become comfortable through repetition.
  • Build a shared standard for written and spoken communication across a team.
  • Address specific usage problems quickly without a full writing course.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this course appropriate for strong writers, or is it for people who struggle with grammar?

Both. The course focuses on the errors that even careful, experienced communicators make, including the habitual ones that feel correct because they have never been challenged. Strong writers consistently find useful corrections in the nonstandard usage and sound-alike sections.

The course is two hours. Is that enough time to cover grammar meaningfully?

Yes, because the course does not try to cover everything. It addresses the eight categories of errors that appear most often in professional communication and produce the most noticeable improvement in the least amount of time. Two focused hours on the right problems outperforms a full day on rules that rarely come up.

Does this course cover punctuation and sentence structure?

This course focuses on usage, word choice, verb conjugation, and pronoun rules rather than punctuation or sentence mechanics. For teams that need both, we offer courses that address the full range of writing mechanics.

Is this appropriate for teams where some members are stronger communicators than others?

Yes. The course works well for mixed-level groups. The quick wins and nonstandard usage sections tend to be valuable across all skill levels, and participants with stronger foundations still find corrections in categories they had not examined closely before.

Can this session be customized to focus on the errors our team makes most often?

Yes. If you have specific usage problems you want the session to prioritize, share them in the pre-session conversation and we will adjust the emphasis accordingly.

Why Business Training Works

Our facilitators know that grammar errors are habit problems as much as knowledge problems, and they teach accordingly. The goal is not to recite rules but to replace the constructions that have stopped sounding wrong with ones that are right. They bring more than twenty-five years of experience designing programs that stick to every session, and they start with a conversation about your team and what it most needs to get right. That conversation shapes where the two hours go.

After the Session

Grammar habits improve when people catch their own errors rather than waiting to be corrected. A well-designed session raises awareness of the specific patterns worth watching, and that awareness compounds over time. We are glad to discuss what reinforcement looks like if you want more than a one-time lift.

We Start with Your Goals

Tell us which errors show up most often in your team's communication and what the work context requires. That conversation shapes the examples, the emphasis, and where the session spends its time. Reach out when you are ready to talk.

Related Courses and Workshops