Critical Thinking Training Program

Course Highlights

This virtual critical thinking skills course will:

• Differentiate critical thinking from creative thinking.
• Introduce methods for identifying issues, problems, and decisions.
• Present frameworks like the DOUBT method, Socratic questioning, and various analytical models.
• Provide tools for evaluating the credibility and relevance of information.
• Introduce models for structuring arguments and presenting information effectively.

Course Overview

“With Good Reason: An Introduction to Critical Thinking” is an interactive course that helps participants move beyond assumptions and knee-jerk reactions, guiding them toward thoughtful, well-supported conclusions and decisions.

The first segment establishes a foundation for critical thinking, focusing on the distinction between critical and creative thinking and outlining the stages of the critical thinking process. Participants will learn to identify underlying issues and decisions that demand attention and practice techniques like Socratic questioning and the DOUBT method to dissect and refine arguments. Analytical tools such as fishbone diagrams, SWOT analysis, fault tree analysis, and value stream mapping will be introduced, giving participants practical ways to explore complex issues.

The second segment turns attention to information assessment and structured argumentation. Participants will explore techniques for evaluating the credibility of sources, recognizing common logic fallacies, and synthesizing information effectively. They’ll also learn to present information persuasively using argument models like Toulmin’s Model, Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, Rogerian Argument, and Monroe’s Motivated Sequence. The session culminates in applying all learned techniques to address a realistic workplace issue, helping participants embed critical thinking into their day-to-day decision-making.

Segment One Objectives

At this segment’s conclusion, participants should be able to:

• Differentiate critical and creative thinking.
• Explain the components of the critical thinking process.
• Discuss methodologies for identifying issues, problems, and decisions that should be made.
• Use Socratic questioning.
• Follow the DOUBT method for exploring and refining an argument.
• Explain the value of the teacher method and when it’s appropriate to use.
• Describe how to use a fishbone diagram, SWOT analysis, fault tree analysis, and value stream mapping.

Segment One Modules

• Hey 19: Flipping the Switch
• Method not Madness: Defining Critical Thinking
• Step by Step: Follow the Process
• We’ve Got a Problem: Finding Issues
• A Better Understanding: Forming a Picture
• One Bite at a Time: Eating Elephants

Segment Two Objectives

At this segment’s conclusion, participants should be able to:

• Explain methods for evaluating the credibility and relevance of information.
• Recognize common logic fallacies.
• Follow a five-step synthesis process.
• Describe Toulmin’s Model of Argument, Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, Rogerian Argument, and Monroe’s Motivated Sequence for presenting information.
• Put it all together to address a workplace issue using critical thinking.

Segment Two Modules

• Credentials Please: Assessing Credibility
• Before You Conclude: Recognizing Logic Fallacies and Other Traps
• Decision Decisions: Making Choices
• Pitch Perfect: Presenting the Argument
• Map to a Model: Following a Framework

Target Audience

This virtual training program is designed for groups that want to:

• Enhance their ability to evaluate information critically.
• Improve their decision-making skills by using structured critical thinking techniques.
• Strengthen their ability to present persuasive, well-supported arguments in the workplace.

Suggested Format

• Two-Segment Virtual Classroom Course

Questions This Page Answers About Critical Thinking Training

• Where can I find a virtual course on critical thinking skills for my team?
• Who offers critical thinking training that includes practical tools like the DOUBT method and Socratic questioning?
• How can my team learn to differentiate credible sources from unreliable ones?
• What frameworks can help my group present structured and persuasive arguments?